ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Comparar o implante transcateter de valva aórtica (TAVI) ao tratamento conservador em pacientes inoperáveis ou à cirurgia de troca valvar (SAVR) em pacientes com risco cirúrgico alto ou intermediário conforme a Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), por meio de uma revisão sistemática de avaliações econômicas completas. Avaliar a variabilidade de modelos econômicos, parâmetros, pressupostos e sua influência nos resultados finais. Métodos: Foi realizada uma busca da literatura nas bases Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SciELO e International HTA Base e busca manual. Foram incluídas análises econômicas completas baseadas em modelos econômicos publicadas entre 2011 e 2022, em português, inglês e espanhol. A qualidade dos estudos foi avaliada usando o instrumento QHES (Quality of Health Economic Studies). Resultados: Foram incluídos 36 estudos, majoritariamente análises de custo-utilidade (64%), da Europa (41%), utilizando dados de eficácia dos estudos PARTNER. O modelo de Markov (61%) foi predominante. O custo da prótese do TAVI foi um parâmetro de impacto na análise de sensibilidade nos três grupos. Os estudos alcançaram uma boa qualidade no instrumento QHES. Conclusão: O TAVI tendeu a ser custo-efetivo em relação aos comparadores. Os modelos não foram homogêneos nos parâmetros, horizontes temporais e taxa de desconto, podendo impactar a custo-efetividade do TAVI e dificultar a comparação dos resultados entre diferentes países e perspectivas.
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to conservative treatment in inoperable patients or to valve replacement surgery (SAVR) in patients at high or intermediate surgical risk according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), through a systematic review of comprehensive economic evaluations. Evaluate the variability of economic models, parameters, assumptions and their influence on final results. Methods: A literature search was performed in Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SciELO and International HTA Base and manual search. Complete economic analyzes based on economic models published between 2011 and 2022 in Portuguese, English and Spanish were included. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the QHES (Quality of Health Economic Studies) instrument. Results: Thirty-six studies were included, mostly cost-utility analyses (64%), from Europe (41%), and using efficacy data from the PARTNER studies. The Markov model (61%) was predominant. The cost of the TAVI prosthesis was the most important parameter in the sensitivity analysis in the three groups. The studies achieved a good quality in QHES instrument. Conclusion: TAVI tended to be cost-effective relative to comparators. The models were not homogeneous in parameters, time horizons and discount rate, which may have an impact on the cost-effectiveness of TAVI, making it difficult to compare the results between different countries and perspectives.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Systematic ReviewABSTRACT
This paper introduces the composition of the Chinese version of the European quality of life five-dimension scale (EQ-5D), including two different level scales, EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L, and summarizes the status quo of the application of the above scales. This paper sorts out the utility value sets of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L scales currently developed based on the Chinese population, and provide an important reference for Chinese researchers to choose suitable scales for research on health-related quality of life and health economics cost-utility analysis in the future.
ABSTRACT
Cancer is one of the major fatal diseases that seriously threaten human health， and its burden needs to be solved urgently. Health technology assessment （HTA） can provide scientific evidence-based basis for cancer diagnosis， treatment， prevention and related policy formulation. Cost-utility analysis is the gold standard for economic evaluation in HTA， and the accurate measurement of its health utility is one of the key elements to determine the accuracy of its results. This article focuses on systematic introduction of direct measures， multi-attribute health utility scales， and mapping methods in the field of cancer measurement and reviews their applications in cancer patients. Among them， direct measures are complex， costly， and require a high level of subject knowledge； multi-attribute health utility measures are currently the preferred method for measuring health utility in cancer patients； with the continuous development and refinement of disease-specific utility measures in multi-attribute health utility instruments， the mapping method may gradually decrease in future applications. This paper can provide a reference for the selection of health utility measurement tools for HTA in the field of cancer， and provide evidence-based basis for optimizing resource allocation and policy formulation in the field of cancer.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy than single-use chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced， recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma （ESCC） from the perspective of health system of our country， and provide reference for rational use of drug in clinic. METHODS Based on ORIENT-15 study data， TreeAge Pro 2011 software was used to establish a three-state Markov model of non-progressive survival （PFS）， disease progression and death for cost-utility analysis. The model period was 3 weeks， the research time limit was 10 years， and the discount rate was 5%. The main outputs of the model were total cost， quality-adjusted life year （QALY） and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio （ICER）. The 1-3 times of China’s GDP per capita in 2021 was taken as the threshold of willing- ness to pay （WTP）. The uncertainty of the parameters was analyzed by single factor sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis， and the cost-effectiveness of the two schemes was discussed under three situations： different discount rates， comparison with other similar treatment schemes and charitable drug donation schemes. RESULTS The results of basic analysis showed that compared with chemotherapy plan alone， the ICER of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy was 64 208.75 yuan/QALY， which was less than WTP threshold. The results of single factor sensitivity analysis show that PFS state utility value， cycle cost of sintilimab and discount rate had relatively great influence on the results. Probability sensitivity analysis showed that when WTP≥120 000 yuan， the economic probability of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy plan was 100%. The results of situational analysis showed that sintilimab combined chemotherapy was more cost- effective than single-use chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Sintilimab combined with chemotherapy is more cost-effective than single-use chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced， recurrent or metastatic ESCC.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of denosumab and teriparatide in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Chinese women， and provide reference for relevant decision-making. METHODS From the perspective of health system in China， Excel 2003 was used to establish Markov model， and cost-utility analysis was used to evaluate the cost- effectiveness of denosumab or teriparatide combined with Calcium carbonate D3 tablets in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Chinese women. Pharmacotherapy effects were obtained with network meta-analysis， and cost and health utility value data were obtained from published literature. The model cycle was 1 year， and the simulation time limit was the patient’s lifetime. Univariate sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used to evaluate the effects of model parameter changes on the robustness of the results. Through scenario analysis， the cost-effectiveness of domestic drug cost used as drug cost of terlipatide group was discussed； the influence of residual effects of teriparatide on the results and the cost-effectiveness of sequential use of desumamab after terlipatide withdrawal were also discussed. RESULTS The effect of denosumab regimen was better than that of terlipatide regimen [13.24 quality-adjusted life years （QALYs） vs. 12.96 QALYs]， with lower cost （51 224.64 yuan vs. 167 102.67 yuan）， denosumab regimen was the absolutely superior regimen. The results of single factor sensitivity analysis showed that the cost and discount rate of Terlipatide injection had greater impact on the results. The results of probability sensitivity analysis showed that when three times of China’s per capita gross domestic product （GDP） in 2021 was used as the threshold of willingness to pay， the probability of cost-effectiveness of denosumab regimen was 93.5%. The results of scenario analysis showed that， whether the drug cost of terlipatide regimen which was replaced by domestic drugs， or the residual effect of terlipatide was considered， or desulmonab was used sequentially after two years of terlipide treatment， denosumab regimen was always the absolute advantage regimen. CONCLUSIONS Denosumab combined with Calcium carbonate D3 tablets is more cost-effective than teriparatide combined with Calcium carbonate D3 tablets in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Chinese women.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vericiguat combined with standard treatment in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction （HFrEF）. METHODS Based on the results of the VICTORIA trial and related literature， a three-state （including stable state of heart failure， hospitalized state of heart failure and death state） Markov model was constructed. The cycle length was 1 month， the time horizon was 20 years， the discount rate was 5%， and one time China’s per capita gross domestic product （GDP） in 2021 was the willing-to-pay （WTP） threshold. Cost-utility analysis was performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vericiguat combined with standard treatment in the treatment of HFrEF. The output indicators included quality-adjusted life year （QALY） and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio （ICER）. The robustness of the results of the basic analysis was verified by one-way sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis. RESULTS The ICER of vericiguat combined with the standard treatment plan compared to the standard treatment plan alone was 444 341.95 yuan/QALY， which was more than WTP of this study （80 976 yuan/QALY）. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the probability of cardiovascular death in both groups was the main influencing parameter for the robustness of the model， but they had little influence on the results of the basic analysis. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis displayed that under the WTP threshold of this study， the possibility of vericiguat combined with the standard treatment plan being more cost-effective was 2.6%. CONCLUSIONS Compared with the standard treatment plan， vericiguat combined with the standard treatment plan is not cost-effective in patients with HFrEF.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sugemalimab in patients with stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC） whose disease had not progressed after concurrent or sequential chemoradiotherapy from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. METHODS Based on the GEMSTONE-301 clinical trial，a three-health state partitioned survival model （PartSA） was developed to simulate the progression of disease，with model cycle of 3 weeks and a lifetime time range； the main output indicators of the model were total cost，quality-adjusted life year （QALY），and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio （ICER）； the cost and health output were discounted using 5% discount rate. Using 1-3 times China’s per capita gross domestic product （GDP） in 2022 as the willingness-to-pay （WTP） threshold，the cost-utility analysis method was used for analysis，and sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were conducted to assess model robustness. RESULTS Compared with placebo，ICER for sugemalimab consolidation therapy was 59 872.57 yuan/QALY，which was less than one time China’s per capita GDP in 2022 （85 698 yuan） as the WTP threshold. The scenario analysis results further confirmed the robustness of the model. The results of single factor sensitivity analysis indicated that the cost of drugs （pembrolizumab，sugemalimab，docetaxel） and the utility value of disease progression status had a significant impact on ICER； the results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that sugemalimab had 67.2% probability of being cost-effective at one time China’s GDP per capita in 2022 as the WTP threshold； when 20 000 yuan （less than 3 times GDP per capita in China of 257 094 yuan） was used as the WTP threshold，the probability of sugemalimab consolidation therapy being cost-effective was greater than 98%. CONCLUSIONS The consolidation therapy with sugemalimab is cost-effective for stage Ⅲ NSCLC whose disease had not progressed after concurrent or sequential chemoradiotherapy.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy versus placebo combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced or unresectable biliary tract carcinoma （BTC） from the perspective of China’s health system. METHODS A partitioned survival model was constructed based on the KEYNOTE-966 study data. The simulation period was 21 days， and the simulation time was the patient’s whole life. Using quality-adjusted life year （QALY） as the output indicator， the cost-utility analysis method was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the two schemes mentioned above. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to verify the results of the basic analysis， and to explore the cost-effectiveness under the scenario of drug donation scheme. RESULTS The basic analysis showed that both the cost and effectiveness of the pembrolizumab group were higher than those of the placebo group， and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio （ICER） was 3 909 359.78 yuan/QALY， which was higher than the willingness-to-pay （WTP） threshold of 3 times 2022 gross domestic product （GDP） per capita （257 094 yuan）， indicating no cost-effectiveness. The results of univariate sensitivity analysis showed that the utility discount rate， the utility value of progression-free survival （PFS） status， the cost discount rate， and the cost of pembrolizumab had a great influence on ICER. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis verified the robustness of the results of basic analysis， and concluded that when the WTP threshold was greater than 1 500 000 yuan/QALY， the pembrolizumab group became cost-effective. The results of the scenario analysis showed that considering the drug donation scheme of pembrolizumab for low-income people， although its treatment cost was significantly reduced， it was still not cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS At the WTP threshold of 3 times China’s GDP per capita in 2022， pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy is not cost-effective compared with placebo combined with chemotherapy for advanced or unresectable BTC.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost -effectiveness of tislelizumab in the second -line treatment of advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma （ESCC）in China .METHODS A three -state Markov model was constructed to assess the cost -effectiveness of tislelizumab versus chemotherapy in the second -line treatment of advanced or metastatic ESCC and programmed death receptor 1（PD-L1）positive patients . The cycle length of the model was 1 month，and the time horizon of the model was set as 10 years. The discount rate of cost and utility was 5%. One-way sensitivity analysis ，probability sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were used to verify the robustness of the base -case analysis results . RESULTS The results of the base-case analysis showed that compared with chemotherapy ，the incremental cost -effectiveness ratio （ICER）of tislelizumab in the second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic ESCC and PD -L1-positive patients were 26 864.01 yuan/QALY and 37 510.07 yuan/QALY，respectively，which was much lower than 1 time per capita gross domestic product （GDP）in 2021（80 976 yuan）. Results of scenario analysis showed that the ICER was less than 1 times per capita GDP ，regardless of the chemotherapy regimens（paclitaxel，docetaxel or irinotecan ）used. With the extension of the simulation time limit ，the ICER of tirelizumab regimen gradually decreased ，and the reduction rate gradually E-mail：lishunping@sdu.edu.cn decreased，but they were all less than 1 time China ’s per capita GDP in 2021. The results of the one -way sensitivity analysis showed that the 3 parameters with the most significant impact on the ICER were progression -free survival of tislelizumab group ，price of tislelizumab ，and the proportion of patients receiving follow-up treatment in the tislelizumab group . The results of the probability sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of tislelizumab with cost -effectiveness in the treatment of advanced or metastatic ESCC patients and PD -L1-positive patients were 99.09% and 99.94%，respectively，when using 3 times per capita GDP as the willingness -to-pay threshold . CONCLUSIONS Tislelizumab has economic advantages over chemotherapy alone in the second -line treatment of advanced or metastatic ESCC patients.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Aim: The study aimed to conduct a cost-utility analysis of traditional drug therapy (TDT) provided for hypertensive patients at primary care in comparison to the protocol based on combination with an exercise program (TDT+E) in real-life conditions, adopting a health system perspective. Methods: Longitudinal study based on enrollment of 49 hypertensive adults distributed into two groups, for 12 months. Quality-adjusted life years were estimated using health-related quality of life. Direct health care costs were calculated including inputs and human resources in primary care from medical records. Sensitivity analysis was performed based on multivariate and probabilistic scenarios. Results: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of TDT+E in comparison to TDT were +79.69. Sensitivity analysis showed that TDT+E presented advantages considering uncertainties. Conclusion: Our findings show that exercise programs may improve quality of life and life expectancy among hypertensive patients.
Subject(s)
Humans , Primary Health Care/methods , Quality of Life , Exercise , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Hypertension/drug therapy , Longitudinal Studies , Health Care CostsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in the first-line treatment of unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma （MPM）. METHODS From the perspective of healthcare system ，a partitioned survival model were developed ，the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab （dual-immunotherapy plan ）versus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of unresectable MPM by cost-utility analysis. Clinical trial data were collected from CheckMate 743 study. Direct medical cost included drug costs ，disease management cost and cost of treatment of adverse reactions. Costs and utilities were discounted at an annual rate of 5％. The willingness to pay threshold was 3 times of gross domestic product （GDP）per capita in 2021 [242 928 yuan/QALY（quality-adjusted life year ）]. Scenario analysis was used to analyze and compare the two regimens under the scenario of complimentary drug for patients in dual-immunotherapy group. The robustness of the findings was evaluated by one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS Baseline analysis results showed that total cost of dual-immunotherapy regimen was higher than that of chemotherapy regimen ，and the utility was also better than that of chemotherapy plan ；the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio （ICER）was 417 122.2 yuan/QALY，which was higher than the willingness to pay threshold ；the dual-immunotherapy regimen was not cost-effective compared to the chemotherapy regimen. Under the scenario of complimentary drug ，the cost of dual-immunotherapy was 327 454.5 yuan，ICER was 75 664.1 yuan/QALY，which was lower than the willingness to pay threshold and resulted in a reversal of the baseline analysis. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that under the health states of progression free survival and progressive disease ，utility value and the price of nivolumab had a greater impact on the ICER value. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the results of baseline analysis were robust. CONCLUSIONS At a 163.com willingness to pay threshold of 3 times of GDP per capita in nivolumab combined with ipilimumab is not cost-effective compared with chemotherapy regimen in the first-line treatment of unresectable MPM. However ，if patients receive complimentary drugs ，the dual-immunotherapy regimen is cost-effective.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab for consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer from the perspective of the Chinese health care system. METHODS A Markov model was developed by using updated four-year survival data from the PACIFIC trial in May 2021 and relevant literature. The cost-effectiveness of durvalumab for consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer was evaluated by using quality-adjusted life years （QALYs）as health output index with 20-year simulation time frame and a 2-week cycling period. The costs and health output were discounted using discount rate of 5％；one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used to examine the robustness of the model simulation results. RESULTS The results of the base analysis showed that compared with placebo group ，durvalumab resulted in 0.73 QALYs at an incremental cost of 1 076 062.86 yuan and an incremental cost-utility ratio （ICER）of 1 467 546.54 yuan/QALY，which was much higher than 3-fold per capita gross domestic products （GDP）in 2020（217 713 yuan）as willingness-to-pay （WTP）threshold. The results of one-way sensitivity analysis showed that the price of durvalumab and discount rate had a great impact on ICER. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed no cost-effective advantage for durvalumab when the WTP threshold was three times of GDP per capita in 2020 （217 713 yuan）. CONCLUSIONS From the perspective of Chinese health care system ，there is no cost-effective advantage to the use of durvalumab for consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer when the WTP threshold was three times of GDP per capita in 2020.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To evaluate the economics of atezolizumab combined with stardard chemotherapy regimens versus chemotherapy regimens alone as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer （ES-SCLC）from the healthcare system perspective. METHODS ：A partitioned survival model was constructed using published phase Ⅲ clinical trial data （IMpower133）and literature data to evaluate the economics of atezolizumaba combined with standard chemotherapy regimens versus chemotherapy regimens alone as first-line treatment for ES-SCLC. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used to evaluate the stability of the results. RESULTS ：The results of cost-utility analysis showed that the cost of atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy group was 489 598.52 yuan，with utility of 0.70 QALYs；the cost of chemotherapy alone group was 126 276.80 yuan，with utility of 0.55 QALYs；the incremental cost-utility ratio （ICUR）between the two groups was 2 361 709.05 yuan/QALY，far exceeding the willingness-to-pay （WTP）in China （3 times of GDP per capita in 2019，212 676 yuan）. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that progression-free utility value of atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy had the greatest impact on the results of cost-utility analysis ；probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that the atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy regimen was not economical within the WTP range of 0-500 000 yuan/QALY. CONCLUSIONS ：Atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy regimen has no cost-utility advantage versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of ES-CLC under the current economic level of China.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To evaluate the economy of pe rospirone in the treatment of schizophrenia ，to provide guidance for clinically proper use of medications more cost-effectively ，and related health decision-making . METHODS ：A short-term decision tree model was constructed from the perspective of medical insurance payer to calculate the cost and health outcomes of different treatment plans considering major adverse events including extrapyramidal reaction ，weight gain ，diabetes，hyperlipidemia. The cost-utility of perospirone were compared with quetiapine ，aripiprazole and olanzapine respectively ，using QALYs as the measure of health outcomes ，3 times GDP per capita as the willingness-to-pay threshold ；probability sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS：The results of base-case analysis showed that the cost of perospirone （6 688.25 yuan）was lower than those of quetiapine （9 887.45 yuan），aripiprazole（13 284.65 yuan）and olanzapine （15 332.80 yuan）. The utility of perospirone （0.79 QALYs）was better than those of quetiapine （0.76 QALYs），aripiprazole（0.77 QALYs）and olanzapine （0.75 QALYs）. Compared with quetiapine ， aripiprazole and olanzapine ，peropirone had lower cost and higher health outcome ，which indicated that strong dominance favors perospirone over the other 3 drugs. The results of sensitivity analysis were consistent with those of base-case analysis. CONCLUSIONS：Perospirone has economic advantages in treating schizophrenia patients compared to other commonly used atypical antipsychotic drugs.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To evaluate the cost-utility of the pan-genotypic direct-acting antivirals （DAAs）in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection ，and to provide pharmacoeconomic evidence for relevant health care decisions. METHODS：A Markov model was established from a societal perspective with newly diagnosed chronic hepatitis C patients in China as the target population ，and analyzed quality-adjusted life years （QALYs）and incremental cost-utility ratios （ICERs）of patients with chronic hepatitis C with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir ，glecaprevir/pibrentasvir，sofosbuvir+coblopasvir. Sensitivity analysis was used to verity the robustness of the results. RESULTS ：Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir increased QALYs by 0.002 1 and costs by 25 021 RMB，compared to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir ；its ICERs was 12 129 031 yuan/QALY（willingness to pay threshold was 70 892 yuan/QALY），which had no cost-utility ；glecaprevir/pibrentasvir need to cut down the price by 64.65％ to have cost-utility. Sofosbuvir+coblopasvir increased QALYs by 0.002 0 and saved costs by 515 yuan，so it was the optimal regimen which was cost-saving. Sensitivity analysis showed that SVR rates and drug prices were the most influential factors. The probability of having cost-utility for sofosbuvir+coblopasvir was higher than glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. CONCLUSIONS ：Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir need to reduce the price to achieve better affordability. Sofosbuvir+coblopasvir shows economical advantage.
ABSTRACT
This research was to evaluate the economics of Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pills combined with conventional therapy for patients with coronary heart disease(CHD) in Chinese medical environment. From the perspective of medical insurance, a Markov model was established in this study based on the results of Meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and safety of Shexiang Tongxin Dripping Pills combined with conventional treatment and conventional treatment alone. The experimental group was treated with She-xiang Tongxin Dropping Pills combined with conventional Western medicine treatment, while the control group was treated with conventional Western medicine treatment alone. The cost-utility analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed for the two regimens using Treeage pro. After 30 cycles of model simulation, according to the results of Markov model, the total cost and health output were CNY 237 795.73 and 16.36 QALYs(the quality adjusted life years, QALYs), respectively for Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pills combined with conventional Western medicine treatment, CNY 247 396.55 and 16.36 QALYs respectively for the conventional Western medicine treatment alone. Compared with the conventional treatment alone, the Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pills combined with conventional treatment had lower long-term cost and higher health output, with advantages of cost-utility and pharmacoeconomic advantages. The sensitivity analysis results showed that the conclusion was relatively stable. Based on the above results, it is considered that compared with the conventional Western medicine alone, Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pill combined with conventional Western medicine is a treatment regimen with pharmacoeconomic advantages for the treatment of CHD.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Coronary Disease/drug therapy , Drugs, Chinese Herbal , Economics, PharmaceuticalABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To evaluate the co st-utility of bivalent human papilloma virus （HPV）vaccine for 12-year-old girls in China and provide economic evidence for health service decision makers. METHODS ：The CERVIVAC model was used to simulate the population of 12-year-old girls in China for a long time until all the population entered a state of death （1 year as a cycle ）. The cost and health output of the people in experimental group who received the bivalent HPV vaccine and the control group who did not receive the vaccine were calculated separately ， and the economics was judged combined with willingness to pay threshold [WTP ，1 time of China ’s per capita gross domestic product （GDP）in 2019]. RESULTS ：During the simulation period ， the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio （ICER） of the experimental group compared with the control group was 28 660.56 yuan/QALY，which was less than WTP and had pharmacoeconomic advantages. The results of single-factor sensitivity analysis showed that the five parameters that had a greater impact on ICER were discount rate ，the proportion of HPV- 16/HPV-18-induced cervical cancer ，vaccine effective rate ，direct economic burden of early/in situ cancer each year and the direct economic burden of advanced/metastatic cancer each year. The results of probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the experimental group was more acceptable（74％）than the control group when using 1 time of China ’s per capita GDP in 2019 as WTP ；the experimental group had a greater cost-utility advantage when WTP was higher than 25 876 yuan/QALY. CONCLUSIONS ：For the prevention of cervical cancer，the bivalent HPV vaccine for 12-year-old girls in China has more cost-utility advantages than no vaccine intervention.
ABSTRACT
Antecedentes La osteoartritis destaca por su alta prevalencia y deterioro funcional, siendo la causa más común de incapacidad en mayores de 65 años. El régimen de Garantías Explícitas en Salud chileno otorga cobertura a tratamiento médico a las presentaciones leves y moderadas, excluyendo el manejo quirúrgico en la presentación severa. Objetivos Evaluar el costo-utilidad de incorporar el reemplazo total de rodilla al régimen de Garantías Explícitas en Salud para asegurados del seguro público sobre 65 años en Chile, versus la mantención con manejo farmacológico. Métodos Revisión sistemática explortaria para identificar los parámetros del modelo y evaluaciones económicas basadas en un modelo de Markov de seis estados de salud, desde la perspectiva del pagador público y horizonte lifetime. Se calculó la razón de costo-utilidad incremental que condujo al análisis de incertidumbre determinístico y probabilístico. Resultados Se seleccionaron 22 artículos como fuentes de referencia. Incorporar el procedimiento al alero del régimen, implicaría beneficiarse de 9,8 años de vida ajustados por calidad versus 2,4 en el escenario sin acceso a cirugía. La razón de costo-utilidad incremental es menos $445 689 pesos chilenos por años de vida ajustados por calidad (menos 633,8 dólares americanos por años de vida ajustados por calidad), siendo la incorporación de cirugía de reemplazo al régimen una alternativa dominante, versus el escenario de acceso insuficiente en otros regímenes de cobertura. Cada año de vida ajustado por calidad gracias a la cirugía ahorrará $445 689 pesos chilenos. A una voluntad de pago de $502 596 pesos chilenos por años de vida ajustados por calidad (714,7 dólares americanos por años de vida ajustados por calidad), la alternativa de acceso a reemplazo es costo-útil con 99,9% de certeza. Conclusión El reemplazo total de rodilla en mayores de 65 años es una alternativa dominante. El acceso a cirugía en el régimen de Garantías Explícitas en Salud para el sistema público es costo-útil a un umbral de un producto interno bruto per cápita.
Background Osteoarthritis is an important health condition due to its prevalence and functional deterioration, being the most common cause of disability in people over 65 years of age. The Chilean Explicit Health-Guarantees regime provides coverage for medical treatment in mild and moderate presentations, excluding surgical treatment in end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Objectives To evaluate the cost-utility of incorporating total knee replacement to the Explicit Health-Guarantees regime for over-65-years beneficiaries of the public insurance system, versus maintenance with medical treatment. Methods A Scoping review was coducted to identify model parameters and economic evaluation based in a 6 health states Markov Model, from the perspective of the public payer and lifetime horizon. The Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) was calculated, and deterministic and probabilistic uncertainty analysis were performed. Results Twenty-two articles were selected as reference sources. If the regime were to adopt the procedure, the implication would be a benefit of 9.8 Years of Life Adjusted by Quality (QALY) versus 2.4 QALY in the scenario without access to total knee replacement. The ICUR was $ -445 689 CLP/QALY (U$D -633.8/QALY), wherein the inclusion of total knee replacement to the regime becomes a dominant alternative versus the current scenario. Each quality-adjusted life-year gained by the surgery will save CLP 445 689. At a willingness to pay of CLP 502,596/QALY (U$D 714.7/QALY), access to surgery is cost-useful with a 99.9% certainty. Conclusion Total knee replacement in patients older than 65 years is a dominant alternative. Access to this procedure in the Chilean Explicit Health-Guarantees regime in the public system is cost-useful at a threshold of 1 GDP per capita.
Subject(s)
Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/economics , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Chile , Markov Chains , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Osteoarthritis, Knee/economicsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To evaluate the economics of infliximab in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. METHODS ：Retrieved from CNKI ，Wanfang database ，VIP，PubMed，Embase database and Cochrane Library since Oct. 16th in 2019，randomized controlled trials （RCTs）about infliximab （trial group ）vs. conventional drugs （control group ）in the treatment of ulcerative colitis were collected ，and efficacy and safety of two groups were compared by Meta-analysis. The economics were analyzed by cost-utility analysis ，and single factor sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis were conducted. RESULTS ：The results of Meta-analysis showed that clinical response rate [RR ＝1.97，95％ CI （1.64，2.36），P＜0.000 01] and clinical remission rate [RR ＝3.19，95％CI（1.83，5.57），P＜0.000 1] in double blind trial subgroup of infliximab treatment were both significantly higher than than control group of conventional treatment. There was no statistical significance in the incidence of severe ADR between 2 groups [RR ＝0.76，95％CI（0.54，1.06），P＝0.10]. The incremental cost-utility ratio of trial group was 348 243.88 yuan/quality-adjusted life-year （QALY），which was significantly higher than the patient ’s willingness to pay threshold （212 676 yuan）.The sensitivity analysis supported above results. CONCLUSIONS ：Under the current level of medical security in China ， compared with conventional therapy ，infliximab is less economical for the treatment of ulcerative colitis.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To evaluate the drug economy of ixekizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS： Literatures were retrieved from PubMed ， Embase， The Cochrane Library ， CNKI and Wanfang database ， supplemented by manual search ，search time from the database establishment to Oct. 31st，2019，using Chinese and English search terms included “Ixekizumab”“Taltz”“Psoriasis”“Pharmacoeconomics”“Cost-benifit analysis ”“Cost-effectiveness analysis ” “Cost-utility analysis ”，etc. The literatures were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Relevant pharmacoeconomic studies about ixekizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were collected ，and the study methods and pharmacoeconomic evaluation results were summarized. RESULTS ：A total of 8 literatures were included ，involving 9 studies. The overall quality of the studies was high. All the studies were distributed in foreign countries such as Canada ，the United States and the United Kingdom. All the studies adopted Markov model. The health outcomes showed that ixekizumab could bring more quality-adjusted life years. Compared with methotrexate combined with phototherapy ，infliximab，ustekinumab and secukinumab ， the incremental cost-utility ratio （ICUR）of ixekizumab was different in different studies. CONCLUSIONS ：Ixekizumab has certain economic advantages for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis ，but there is still a lack of relevant research in China and it is urgent to carry out relevant research suitable for Chinese.